Strange how someone, who is supposedly confident about the outcome of civil proceedings, is doing his utmost to intimidate Secma's clients into signing new contracts, while on the other hand claiming Secma's clients to be his anyway.
I just hope all the new partners in this scheme manage to open their eyes before it's too late for them as well. Creating side-issues to deflect the focus from fraudulent activities will only fool a handful of people, as should be quite apparent by now.
Why don't you provide a full list of Safe Security's contraventions of the PSIRA Act so we can compare notes, Mr Transparent.
Secma vs Safe Security Hermanus
No comments:
Post a Comment