Well, Mr Wreck, you make it quite obvious that you are trying to avoid answering to relevant issues, even though you've raised them yourself....do not think that it goes by unbeknownst to the public.
Your security of cost application should be an interesting one, since (at least) R 470 000.00 of Secma's money is at the very heart of these court matters.
You really think you can just unlawfully take money and then plead for more??
You are quite right that the name Secma seems new to a lot of people, although the name as well as the company exists since 1999.
You should hear the comments when your new clients are told and shown that they are contracting to Beckazaku (trading since 2002 or 2009 - not sure anymore) ........ can you imagine the surprise?
Unwitting clients lured into the abyss........
I really think it's time to stop being reck-less and to realise that you've overplayed your hand.
As a wise guru once told me : "Never test the water with both feet ...."
Secma vs Safe Security Hermanus
No comments:
Post a Comment